Rosales v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence which was originally obtained improperly should not be suppressed, provided that it would have been legitimately uncovered pursuant to normal police practices.”
• “[Ejvidence which was originally obtained improperly should not be suppressed, provided that it would have been legitimately uncovered pursuant to normal police practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jardines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-22· cited 21×
• POVIONES v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nix v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
• United States v. Zapata
  First Circuit· 1994-03-25· cited 220×
• United States v. Joseph Noel Seals
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 182×
• United States v. Cyrus Jonathan George
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-08-12· cited 156×
• Munoz v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 111×
• Maulden v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 42×
• Hatcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-03· cited 17×
• State v. Myers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-22· cited 3×
• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-04· cited 1×