Skip to main content

Hatcher v. State

Citations

  • 834 So. 2d 314
  • 2003 WL 19936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine ... ‘forbids the use of evidence in court if it is the product or fruit of a search or seizure ... earned out in violation of constitutional rights.’”
  • applying inevitable discovery doctrine where the police officers would have inevitably found the evidence based upon normal police investigatory procedures of running warrants search after issuing a citation
  • first quoting Craig v. State, 510 So. 2d 857, 862 (Fla. 1987); and then citing United States v. Cruz, 581 F.2d 535, 537 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Causey, 834 F.2d 1179, 1184-85 (5th Cir. 1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.