Roper v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ritualistic compliance with all the requirements of [Uniform Superior Court Rule 33] is not necessary where the record demonstrates that the core considerations, i.e., the substantive elements of [Boykin] concerning the defendant’s guilty or nolo contendere plea, are met”
• applying Boykin to a plea of nolo contendere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vanegas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-04-10· cited 4×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-10-09· cited 2×
• Covin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-08· cited 2×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-17
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-04-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1995-03-06· cited 117×
• Goodman v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-10· cited 57×
• State v. Germany
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-02-26· cited 53×
• Staples v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-07-15· cited 37×
• Huff v. Barnett
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-04-13· cited 26×
• Maddox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-08-04· cited 24×
• McClendon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-25· cited 20×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-02-15· cited 10×
• Paino v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-06-03· cited 6×