Goodman v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274) (1969)
• interpreting Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (89 SC 1709, 23 LE2d 274) (1969)
• “it is not permissible to presume from a silent record that a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered”
• \it is not permissible to presume from a silent record that a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered\
• “We decline to adopt a rule which would demand that failure to advise an accused of his right against self-incrimination invalidates a guilty plea in a case where the record reflects that the central considerations of Boykin have otherwise been met.”
• \We decline to adopt a rule which would demand that failure to advise an accused of his right against self-incrimination invalidates a guilty plea in a case where the record reflects that the central considerations of Boykin have otherwise been met.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).