Skip to main content

Maddox v. State

Citations

  • 461 S.E.2d 286
  • 218 Ga. App. 320
  • 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2662
  • 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a pro se demand for a speedy trial filed by a defendant while he is represented by counsel is a nullity
  • “The trial court was clearly authorized to find that the pro se demand was of no legal effect whatsoever.”
  • pro se filings of inmate represented by counsel given no legal effect whatsoever
  • The t rial court correctly denied the defendant's motion for acquittal where the defendant had filed his demand for a speedy trial pro se while represented by counsel and, as a result, \the demand was a nullity\ and \of no legal effect whatsoever.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Johnson, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.