Skip to main content
· 10/20/1994

Roosth v. Roosth

Citations

  • 889 S.W.2d 445
  • 1994 WL 513978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, after review of evidence, that services performed by appellee's attorneys were related to needs of children
  • holding, after review of evidence, that services performed by appellee’s attorneys were related to needs of children
  • deciding whether the evidence was legally and factually sufficient to support the award of attorney’s fees
  • holding, after review of evidence, that services performed by appellee = s attorneys were related to needs of children
  • reversing order that required mother's mutual agreement to father's possession of children
  • reversing order that required mother’s mutual agreement to father’s possession of children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears, Lee, Junell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.