Skip to main content
· 6/15/2004

Niskar v. Niskar

Citations

  • 136 S.W.3d 749
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 5225
  • 2004 WL 1328085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the trial court abused its discretion by failing to order the appellant’s possession of and access to the child in clear and unambiguous terms” because “the appellant could not successfully enforce this judgment by contempt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whittington, Lang, Lang-Miers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.