Rooks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was permissible for the State to test the credibility of appellant’s trial testimony by cross-examination
• court misreads Harris to allow use of involuntary statements to impeach which restores vitality to its previous decisions
• court misreads Harris to allow use of involuntary statements to impeach which restores vitality to its previous decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oregon v. Hass
  Supreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
• State v. Santiago
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1971-12-29· cited 256×
• Commonwealth v. Triplett
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 139×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1975-06-02· cited 62×
• State v. Mills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-14· cited 17×
• Spillers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-03-10· cited 11×
• Horne v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-02-26· cited 10×
• Zachry v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1976-07-06· cited 8×
• Hendrickson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-11-17· cited 8×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-11-01· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• Harris v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
• Decker v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1962-01-29· cited 10×