Ronald Love v. Fredrick Menifee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing Section 2241 petitions in dicta as “free of [gatekeeping] limitations”
• Section 2255 is not “inadequate or ineffective” simply because “its gatekeeping provisions bar review of a petitioner’s claim.”
• no serious constitutional question raised by unavailability of retroactive § 2255 relief on an Apprendi claim
• Section 2255 is not \inadequate or ineffective\ simply because \its gatekeeping provisions bar review of a petitioner's claim.\
• Section 2255 is not “inadequate or ineffective” simply because “its gatekeeping provisions bar review of a petitioner’s claim.”
• appellant barred from raising Apprendi challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).