Alfred v. Bottone, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[R]ecalling the mandate in such circumstances would be allowable only if it would be proper to authorize a second or successive collateral attack.”’
• “Under Calderon, recalling the mandate more than six years after its issuance ‘just to apply the benefit of hindsight,’ would constitute an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).