Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/29/1987
Romeo v. Looks
Citations
- 535 A.2d 1101
- 369 Pa. Super. 608
- 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s denial to reopen judgment where complaint validly served
- affirming trial court’s denial to reopen judgment where complaint validly served
- “[A] method of substituted service is reasonably calculated to give actual notice depending upon ‘what is reasonable under the circumstances, considering the interests at stake and the burdens of providing notice.”
- a method of substituted service is reasonably calculated to give actual notice depending upon “what is reasonable under the circumstances, considering the interests at stake and the burdens of providing notice”
- “Due process, reduced to its most elemental component, requires notice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Brosky, Rowley, Wieand, McEwen, Olszewski, Beck, Tamilia, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.Third Circuit· 1993-03-19· cited 71×
- Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-25· cited 65×
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. Unknown HeirsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-16· cited 63×
- Deer Park Lumber, Inc. v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-08· cited 31×
- Trexler, A. v. McDonald's Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-03· cited 29×
- Meeks v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-02-26· cited 19×
- Sisson, D. & M. v. Stanley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-01-27· cited 19×
- Century Sur. Co. v. Essington Auto Ctr., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-18· cited 15×
- Clayman v. JungE.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-06-13· cited 7×
- Perkins v. TSG. INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-12· cited 5×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. VanmeterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-14· cited 5×
- University of Pennsylvania v. HalpernMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2009-09-15· cited 5×
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Barron, D. & M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-03-31· cited 2×
- Kennedy v. SpiegelMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-09-06· cited 1×
- Skye Mineral Investors, LLC v. DXS Capital (U.S.) LimitedCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2021-07-15
- William Penn Bank v. East Investments, LLCMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-06-19
- City of Philadelphia v. 1531 Napa, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-03-06
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 179×
- Commonwealth v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-28· cited 143×
- Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-04-22· cited 140×
- McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-04· cited 126×
- Schultz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-28· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-24· cited 70×
- Coggin v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Florida· 1942-05-12· cited 64×
- Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Cooper & Reese, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-07· cited 56×
- Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-14· cited 51×
- Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-30· cited 49×
- Campbell v. Heilman Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 41×
- Stateside MacHinery Company, Ltd., a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of Great Britain and Armin Speigel v. Joel M. AlperinThird Circuit· 1979-01-15· cited 39×
- Action Industries, Inc. v. WiedemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 38×
- Maurice Goldstein Co., Inc. v. MargolinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 31×
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-03· cited 29×
- American Express Co. v. BurgisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-08· cited 24×
- Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 19×
- Fitzgerald v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-03-29· cited 16×
- Cross v. 50th Ward Community Ambulance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-21· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.