Skip to main content
· 6/3/2015

Trexler, A. v. McDonald's Corp.

Citations

  • 118 A.3d 408
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 131
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320
  • 2015 WL 3488538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial court properly permitted the parties to conduct discovery after receiving preliminary objections and an answer thereto raising a question of fact
  • finding service of process improper where plaintiff could not show person who accepted complaint was authorized to accept service on behalf of defendant
  • “[A] dispute over proper service cannot be resolved by reference to facts pled in the complaint. Additional evidence is required.”
  • “[A] dispute over proper service cannot be resolved by reference to facts pled in the complaint. Additional evidence is required.”
  • “[A] dispute over proper service cannot be resolved by reference to facts pled in the complaint. Additional evidence is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Shogan, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.