Skip to main content

McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.

Citations

  • 451 Pa. 495
  • 305 A.2d 698
  • 1973 Pa. LEXIS 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because appellant did not adequately explain the failure to answer the complaint, the trial court was justified in refusing to open the judgment
  • holding that because appellant did not adequately explain the failure to answer the complaint, the trial court was justified in refusing to open the judgment
  • holding that a defendant’s failure to adequately explain failure to answer, alone, justified trial court’s refusal to open a judgment
  • holding that because appellant did not adequately explain the failure to answer the complaint, the trial court was justified in refusing to open the judgment
  • stating that all three factors must be met before a default judgment may be opened
  • stating that a petitioner must meet all three prongs of the test before a default judgment may properly be opened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brien, Eagen, Ino, Jones, Mander, Nix, Pomeroy, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.