Turner v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that prison disciplinary proceedings do not constitute criminal prosecutions. Hence, they do not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause, as its applicability is limited to proceedings that are essentially criminal in nature.”
• between 1977 and 1993, Department had complete and unrestricted discretion to reinstate revoked GCT, which “dispels the notion of a liberty interest”; inmate’s interest in having revoked GCT restored was “merely speculative, as it was dependent on a number of factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Utley v. Tennessee Department of Correction
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-05-01· cited 24×
• Rogers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-04-11· cited 13×
• In Re Goulsby
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-17· cited 13×
• Department of Corrections v. Goulsby
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-17· cited 13×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Higgins
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-22· cited 12×
• In Re Higgins
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-22· cited 11×
• Reidie James Jackson v. Oliver Bell
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2015-12-07· cited 5×
• Jeff Utley v. Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-04-27
• Danny Ray Cline v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Alan Polunsky, and Wayne Scott
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-04-14
• Donald Rogers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-04-11