Rogers v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that public prosecutors enjoy “absolute privilege” with respect to initiation of criminal prosecutions
• officer who filed reports on which prosecution based was potentially liable as “active participant”
• officer who filed reports on which prosecution based was potentially liable as “active participant”
• when a party makes a clear objection to a proposed instruction in a colloquy with the court before the jury is instructed, failure to renew the objection after the instruction is given does not render the claimed error unpreserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ledford v. Gutoski
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-07-29· cited 130×
• McBride v. Magnuson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 89×
• Joshua Venckus v. City of Iowa City
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 42×
• Checkley v. Boyd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-08· cited 40×
• Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 33×
• City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 24×
• Lutz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-14· cited 20×
• Can-Key Industries, Inc. v. Industrial Leasing Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 17×
• Wheeler v. Huston
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 14×
• Waldner v. Dow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-25· cited 10×
• Lepire v. Motor Vehicles Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-07-14· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Winters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 8×
• Richer v. Poisson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-10-11· cited 6×
• Ledford v. Gutoski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 3×
• Heusel v. Multnomah County District Attorney's Office
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 3×
• Westwood v. City of Hermiston
  D. Oregon· 2011-04-15· cited 3×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-20· cited 1×
• Oberstaller v. Richey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-05
• Barish v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 1993-11-18

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NY
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1956-11-05· cited 135×
• Wiebe v. Seely
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-02-11· cited 88×
• Jerke v. Delmont State Bank
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1929-02-08· cited 77×
• Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1930-12-16· cited 69×
• Watts v. Gerking
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-01-14· cited 66×
• Rickard v. Ellis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-01-31· cited 51×
• Wattenburg v. United Medical Laboratories, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-08-08· cited 37×
• United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-11-25· cited 36×
• Smith v. McDuffee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-06-09· cited 36×
• Kraxberger v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-07-18· cited 33×
• Coleman v. Meyer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-01-26· cited 32×
• Schmitz v. Yant
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-12-31· cited 28×
• Rose v. Whitbeck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-31· cited 27×
• Rose v. Whitbeck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-05-24· cited 23×
• Shoemaker v. SELNES
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-02-10· cited 22×
• Chopp v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-12-14· cited 20×
• Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 18×
• Humbert v. KNUTSON
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1960-08-10· cited 18×
• Streight v. Conroy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-08-02· cited 16×
• Foster v. Agri-Chem, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-09-18· cited 15×