Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that issue should not be presented to jury when reasonable minds could not come to different conclusions regarding resolution
• noting that issue should not be presented to jury when reasonable minds could not come to different conclusions regarding resolution
• noting that “when the proof on a question of fact is so strong as to admit of no reasonable doubt as to its existence ... there is no question for the jury to decide.”
• plaintiff's proofs, though uncontradicted, could be rejected by trier of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).