Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• only those persons who purchased stock contemporaneously with the alleged insider stock sales have standing to bring the insider trading claim
• oral financial projections reaffirmed in written report formed primary basis of plaintiffs claims and did not give rise to Affiliated Ute presumption notwithstanding allegations of nondisclosure based on defendant’s failure to correct them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).