Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/9/1978

Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.

Citations

  • 434 U.S. 1022
  • 54 L. Ed. 2d 770
  • 98 S. Ct. 749
  • 1978 U.S. LEXIS 401
  • 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8018
  • 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing equitable reasons for not enforcing deferral requirement
  • recognizing equitable reasons for not enforcing deferral requirement
  • government not required to show in entrapment case that it had reasonable grounds to believe defendant was engaged in unlawful activities
  • if one could obtain emotional and/or punitive damages in federal court, he would have little incentive to settle during the administrative conciliation process
  • no damages for pain and suffering or emotional distress
  • denying recovery for pain and suffering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Stewart, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.