Holloman v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert should have been permitted to testify on effect of mental retardation on ability to understand, communicate
• evidence that defendant was prone to manipulation, suggestion, and intimidation because of his mental retardation \should not have been excluded on the basis of relevancy because it was permissible evidence bearing directly on the reliability of his statements.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).