Skip to main content
M.D. Louisiana· 3/6/2017

Rogers v. Averitt Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 215 F. Supp. 3d 510
  • 2017 WL 881376
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating on motion for sanctions in personal injury suit based on spoliation of evidence that “there is no doubt that . . . the evidence was clearly relevant” when the plaintiff did not allow the defendant’s IME to examine him prior to spine surgery
  • no spoliation where the plaintiff had back surgery without giving the defendant the opportunity to conduct an independent medical exam, despite the defendant’s specific letter to the plaintiff requesting an exam before undergoing surgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Degravelles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.