Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s finding that the child’s hearsay statements were reliable where the court complied with section 90.803(23
• applying abuse of discretion review to a trial court's determination of the reliability and admissibility of child hearsay statements pursuant to section 90.803(23), Florida Statutes
• de scribing that “the child’s answers were given using words consistent with a child her age”
• “The reliability of the statements must be determined independent of any corroborating evidence.”
• “The reliability of the statements must be determined independent of any corroborating evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Platt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-09-28· cited 5×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-09· cited 4×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-04
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-16
• JOSHUA PERRAULT v. AMANDA ENGLE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-15
• OLIVER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-31
• Carlos Martinez-Urbina v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-09-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• State v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-04-21· cited 118×
• Perez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-01· cited 76×
• Ferreiro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-16· cited 8×
• Pedrosa v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-14· cited 3×