Skip to main content

Cole v. State

Citations

  • 727 So. 2d 280
  • 1999 WL 69630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that officer did not have probable cause to seize crack pipe based on plain feel where officer “did not testify that it was immediately apparent to him that the object in [the defendant’s] pocket was contraband”
  • reversing denial of motion to suppress based on \plain feel doctrine\ when officer did not testify that it was immediately apparent to him that the objects he felt were drugs
  • reversing denial of suppression and rejecting \plain feel doctrine\ in the absence of testimony \that it was immediately apparent to\ the arresting officer that a suspicious item was in fact contraband (emphasis added)
  • “[P]robable cause does not arise anytime an officer feels an object that the officer reasonably suspects to be contraband.”
  • seizure of crack pipe from defendant's pants during pat-down search exceeded scope of weapons pat-down where officer never testified that it was immediately apparent to him upon feeling pipe that it was contraband
  • seizure of crack pipe from defendant’s pants during pat-down search exceeded scope of the weapons pat-down where officer never testified that it was immediately apparent to him upon feeling the pipe that it was contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.