Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim that trial court erred in failing to have interpreter sworn as required by statute was barred because this was not fundamental error and there was no contemporaneous objection; matter could have been readily cured if timely called to the attention of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 9×
• Fernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-09· cited 8×
• State v. Goldwire
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 4×
• Obando v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 248×
• Jent v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-12-03· cited 173×
• In re Lucas
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 112×
• Balderrama v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-01· cited 8×
• Mesidor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-09· cited 5×
• State v. Thomas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-13· cited 1×