State v. Goldwire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that where admission of evidence did not constitute fundamental error, “trial court should not have entertained a motion for new trial ... absent an objection”
• \[T]he trial court should not have entertained a motion for new trial based on the label absent an objection.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).