Skip to main content

Fernandez v. State

Citations

  • 786 So. 2d 38
  • 2001 WL 484200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that judgment should be reversed because the transcript does not reflect that an interpreter used at the trial took the interpreter's oath is barred because there was no contemporaneous objection and this was not fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Goderich and Ramirez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.