Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 804 S.W.2d 516
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 38
  • 1991 WL 22996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that A as long as the revocation motion was filed and the capias or arrest warrant issued before the expiration of the appellant's probationary term, the hearing conducted shortly after his arrest was proper @
  • nothing offered to show diligence by the State where address and place of employment were known
  • nothing offered to show diligence by the State where address and place of employment were known
  • an unexplained delay of two years between the issuance of arrest warrant and arrest was fatal
  • State did not prove due diligence when the State knew the defendant's address and place of employment, yet did not attempt to apprehend him
  • State did not prove due diligence when State knew defendant's address and place of employment, yet did not attempt to apprehend him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teague, Baird, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.