Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/27/1991
Rodriguez v. State
Citations
- 804 S.W.2d 516
- 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 38
- 1991 WL 22996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that A as long as the revocation motion was filed and the capias or arrest warrant issued before the expiration of the appellant's probationary term, the hearing conducted shortly after his arrest was proper @
- nothing offered to show diligence by the State where address and place of employment were known
- nothing offered to show diligence by the State where address and place of employment were known
- an unexplained delay of two years between the issuance of arrest warrant and arrest was fatal
- State did not prove due diligence when the State knew the defendant's address and place of employment, yet did not attempt to apprehend him
- State did not prove due diligence when State knew defendant's address and place of employment, yet did not attempt to apprehend him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Teague, Baird, Overstreet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-01-13· cited 421×
- Moss, Jecia JavetteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-11-05· cited 196×
- Peacock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-29· cited 113×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-09· cited 82×
- Brecheisen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-27· cited 78×
- Wheat v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-31· cited 42×
- Bawcom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-26· cited 30×
- Burch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1991-12-11· cited 20×
- Browder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 18×
- Thomas Lee Spruill A/K/A Mauldin Austin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-08-23· cited 17×
- Quisenberry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-09-18· cited 15×
- Beaty v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2001-07-11· cited 14×
- State v. SoldiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-03· cited 14×
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 10×
- Holtzman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-16· cited 9×
- Peacock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-30· cited 8×
- Phuong Nguyen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-07-31· cited 5×
- Brecheisen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-18· cited 5×
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-12-07· cited 5×
- Bawcom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-07-20· cited 3×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Guillot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-01· cited 75×
- Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-12-19· cited 71×
- Hardman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-18· cited 60×
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-19· cited 59×
- Stover v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-03-13· cited 56×
- Prior v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-06· cited 50×
- Ex Parte FennellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1955-11-02· cited 40×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-05· cited 39×
- Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-02-04· cited 18×
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. CokerSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-05-18· cited 16×
- Shahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-27· cited 12×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1990-02-15· cited 6×
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.