Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 843 S.W.2d 34
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 232
  • 1992 WL 359834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • entering capias on TCIC and no explanation of State's inaction despite knowing appellant's address and contact person does not show diligence by the State
  • entering capias on TCIC and no explanation of State’s inaction despite knoyfing appellant’s address and contact person does not show diligence by the State
  • Placing the warrant for appellant's arrest in the TCIC/NCIC computer and updating it periodically is not sufficient, without more, to show due diligence.
  • noting decisions holding that a trial court retained jurisdiction to revoke probation where, among other situations, A a capias or arrest warrant issued prior to expiration of the [probation] period @
  • \Appellant never left the county except to live with relatives known to the probation department.\
  • “Appellant never left the county except to live with relatives known to the probation department.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.