Skip to main content

Burch v. State

Citations

  • 821 S.W.2d 385
  • 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 3035
  • 1991 WL 262455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Shaw v. State, 622 S.W.2d 862, 863 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1981), which requires the State to prove every element in a revocation of probation proceeding by a preponderance of the evidence, and applying the same standard to a due diligence determination
  • relying on Shaw v. State, 622 S.W.2d 862, 863 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1981), which requires the State to prove every element in a revocation of probation' proceeding by a preponderance of the evidence, and applying the same standard to a due diligence determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Cummings, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.