Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. Schutt

Citations

  • 896 P.2d 881
  • 1994 WL 698678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where a party intentionally destroys evidence to prevent its introduction at trial, the trial court clearly has the power to employ an adverse inference as a sanction.”
  • trial court didn’t abuse its discretion by declining to give an adverse inference instruction when the evidence wouldn’t have been unfavorable to the spoliator, and the court found no bad faith
  • certiorari granted May 22, 1995

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Ruland, Briggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.