Colorado Court of Appeals· 5/22/1995
Rodriguez v. Schutt
Citations
- 896 P.2d 881
- 1994 WL 698678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where a party intentionally destroys evidence to prevent its introduction at trial, the trial court clearly has the power to employ an adverse inference as a sanction.”
- trial court didn’t abuse its discretion by declining to give an adverse inference instruction when the evidence wouldn’t have been unfavorable to the spoliator, and the court found no bad faith
- certiorari granted May 22, 1995
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taubman, Ruland, Briggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-07· cited 91×
- Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 58×
- Lauren Corp. v. Century Geophysical Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1998-01-22· cited 28×
- Pfantz v. Kmart Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-03-15· cited 17×
- Aloi v. Union Pacific Railroad Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2006-03-06· cited 16×
- rg v. Excel Elec., IncColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-07-09· cited 10×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re the Marriage of MannSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-12-06· cited 379×
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1993-02-26· cited 209×
- Turner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.S.D. New York· 1991-09-27· cited 140×
- Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-05-07· cited 107×
- Hirsch v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-05-04· cited 91×
- Gallegos v. PhippsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-09-18· cited 50×
- Charlton v. KimataSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-07-15· cited 40×
- Dawson ex rel. McKelvey v. Public Employees' Retirement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-05-31· cited 37×
- Sigman Ex Rel. Sigman v. Seafood Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-09-16· cited 34×
- People v. BowmanColorado Court of Appeals· 1991-05-09· cited 17×
- Puritan Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-08-29· cited 17×
- Ackerman v. Power Equipment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-07-14· cited 12×
- Heid v. DestefanoColorado Court of Appeals· 1978-10-19· cited 11×
- Britt v. BlockD. Vermont· 1986-04-04· cited 6×
- People v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-06-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.