Ackerman v. Power Equipment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In 1982, the General Assembly amended § 13-21-101 to apply a variable market rate of interest if the judgment is appealed by the judgment debtor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. Schutt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 58×
• People ex rel. D.R.W.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 39×
• Rodriguez v. Schutt
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-05-22· cited 13×
• Nieto v. State
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1998-03-23· cited 12×
• Gonzales v. City and County of Denver
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-04-24· cited 2×
• People Ex Rel. Drw
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11
• 20SC947- Ford Motor Company v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2022-06-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-04-26· cited 94×
• Elliott Electric Supply Co. v. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-11-17· cited 3×