Skip to main content
· 3/15/2004

Pfantz v. Kmart Corp.

Citations

  • 85 P.3d 564
  • 2003 WL 21755949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s rulings, including its decision to give an adverse inference jury instruction containing an irrebuttable presumption as a sanction for spoliation
  • “The sanction should be ‘commensurate with the seriousness of the disobedient party’s conduct.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb, Ney, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.