Arizona Supreme Court· 7/16/1982
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 649 P.2d 290
- 133 Ariz. 87
- 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that McCarty did not alter the res judicata consequences of a divorce decree that had become final before McCarty was filed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-13· cited 54×
- De Gryse v. De GryseArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 43×
- Collins v. CollinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-30· cited 25×
- Marriage of Flynn v. RogersArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 23×
- Richards v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-05-24· cited 16×
- Budreau v. BudreauCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-09-15· cited 13×
- Bischofshausen v. Pinal-Gila Counties Air Quality Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-06-01· cited 12×
- Marriage of Schmidt v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-21· cited 7×
- Todd v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-18· cited 7×
- Portley v. PortleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-12· cited 2×
- Edsall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-03-28· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.