Richards v. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that changed circumstances supporting modification of spousal maintenance are proven by a comparison with the circumstances existing at the time of the original award
• “The changed circumstances alleged must be proved by a comparison with the circumstances existing at dissolution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Pearson v. Pearson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-16· cited 29×
• Reeves v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-02· cited 7×
• McClendon v. McClendon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-12-07
• Amadore v. Lifgren
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lindsay v. Lindsay
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-19· cited 45×
• Scott v. Scott
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-28· cited 35×
• In Re the Marriage of Hinkston
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-12· cited 23×
• Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-07-07· cited 21×
• Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-07-16· cited 12×
• Beck v. Jaeger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-10· cited 10×