Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 25-324 was designed to assure the poorer party a remedy
• noting that the USFSPA made MRP subject to Arizona’s community property laws
• declining to consider the merits of an argument that was made “in passing” in the opening brief and was not developed
• A.R.S. § 25-324 overrides the provision in a property settlement agreement awarding attorney’s fees solely on the basis that one party is the prevailing party
• “A property award is essentially permanent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).