Second Circuit· 8/6/2008

Rodriguez v. Miller

Citations

537 F.3d 102
2008 WL 3010107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “Waller does not demand a higher showing before excluding a defendant’s friends and family” and “AEDPA is concerned only with Waller’s holding: that a courtroom closure must pass its four-part test”
affirming denial of habeas petition where “[t]he Undercover [officer] ... had been threatened before and intended to return to [the neighborhood of the arrest] in the near future”
approving of a “closure [that] was to last only for the duration of the [u]ndercover’s testimony.”
confirming family sentiment in Oliver is dicta, and “cannot constitute clearly established federal law”
affirming denial of habeas petition where “[t]he Undercover [officer] . . . had been threatened before and intended to return to [the neighborhood of the arrest] in the near future”
describing Waller “as a rule of general applicability in the courtroom closure context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rodriguez v. Miller

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.