· 8/6/2009
Kirk v. Burge
Citations
- 646 F. Supp. 2d 534
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68754
- 2009 WL 438054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the state court’s decision not to hold a Mapp/Dunaway hearing did not constitute an unconscionable breakdown
- explaining that if the party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error
- explaining that if the party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error
- denying relation back where ineffective assistance of counsel claim differed in both time and type
- “[T]o the extent that the party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error.”
- “[T]o the extent that the party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laura Taylor Swain
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.