Gibbons v. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Waller, insufficient space because of the size of the venire and the risk of tainting the jury pool are not “compelling reasons” for closure
• holding that under Waller, insufficient space because of the size of the venire and the risk of tainting the jury pool are not “compelling reasons” for closure
• holding that under Waller, insufficient space because of the size of the venire and the risk of tainting the jury pool are not \compelling reasons\ for closure
• concluding that the exclusion of 3 1 the public from an afternoon session of voir dire proceedings was trivial
• holding that a courtroom closure was trivial because \nothing of significance happened\ during the closure
• holding that, under Waller, insufficient space because of the size of the venire and the risk of tainting the jury pool are not “compelling reasons” for closure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).