Skip to main content

Roccaforte v. Jefferson County

Citations

  • 341 S.W.3d 919
  • 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 346
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 900
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 325
  • 2011 WL 1661445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that post-suit notice requirement was not jurisdictional, even in light of section 311.034, because post-suit notice is not a “prerequisite” to suit
  • holding that post-suit notice requirement was not jurisdictional, even in light of section 311.034, because post-suit notice is not a “prerequisite” to suit
  • holding that hand-delivered notice satisfies a statute's notice requirement even when the statute's plain language requires notice by certified or registered mail
  • holding that hand-delivered notice satisfies a statute’s notice requirement even when the statute’s plain language requires notice by certified or registered mail
  • holding that post-suit notice requirement was not jurisdictional, even in light of section 311.034, because post- suit notice is not a “prerequisite” to suit
  • holding that final judgment impliedly and necessarily replaced interlocutory summary judgment which merged into the judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson, Willett, Hecht, Wainwright, Medina, Green, Johnson, Guzman, Lehrmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Roccaforte v. Jefferson County

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.