Cox Enterprises v. Bd. of Tr. of Austin ISD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Open Meetings Act requires full disclosure of the subject matter of the meetings
• holding that Open Meetings Act requires full disclosure of subject matter of meetings
• noting that “less than full disclosure is not substantial compliance” and that “the Open Meetings Act requires a full disclosure of the subject matter of the meetings”
• utilizing this formula to determine if the notice afforded was sufficient
• stating the requirement works in tandem with requiring “advance notice of subject matter” so that “it can be determined whether a governmental body is correctly applying the exceptions to [the Act’s] general requirement of open meetings”
• \The Act is intended to safeguard the public's interest in knowing the workings of its governmental bodies.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).