Robinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Truth in Sentencing Act did not violate the Equal Protection Clause by applying only prospectively and thereby creating a “dual system of sentencing” for defendants convicted of the same crimes committed at different times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-25· cited 13×
• Vickers v. Dzurenda
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2018-11-21· cited 1×
• Boyd v. Garraghty
  D. Delaware· 2002-04-30
• VICKERS (TRACEY) VS. DIRECTOR
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-11-21
• State v. Walls
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2019-09-12
• Walker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2020-05-04
• Anderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-10-24

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mistretta v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
• Williams v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 985×
• Clements v. Fashing
  Supreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 772×
• Schweiker v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 721×
• United States v. Mark R. Stewart A/K/A Mark Johnson
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 43×
• Larry Frazier v. John R. Manson, Commissioner of Corrections, Kenneth Schaffer v. Carl Robinson, Warden
  Second Circuit· 1983-03-07· cited 30×
• Jerry Don Foster v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Parole
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-07-12· cited 30×
• Boyer v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-07-18· cited 7×
• Wicks v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-04-06· cited 6×
• Swinson v. United States Parole Commission
  E.D. North Carolina· 1988-02-18· cited 4×