Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/18/1989
Boyer v. State
Citations
- 562 A.2d 1186
- 1989 Del. LEXIS 260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding adoption of time limitations in Rule 61 did not deprive the appellant of due process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Moore, Holland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-04-08· cited 133×
- Webster v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-02-03· cited 17×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-14· cited 10×
- State v. DickensSuperior Court of Delaware· 1989-10-18· cited 3×
- Johnson v. EllingsworthD. Delaware· 1992-02-03· cited 2×
- State of Delaware v. Bass.Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-09-26
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-07-14
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 596×
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 543×
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court· 1902-04-07· cited 183×
- Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1984-07-26· cited 68×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-03-23· cited 38×
- LeCompte v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1986-10-21· cited 36×
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-10-01· cited 13×
- Cranston v. New Process Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware· 1950-07-18· cited 4×
- Moyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-11-16· cited 1×
- Boyer v. RedmanD. Delaware· 1982-12-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.