Court of Appeals of Virginia· 5/5/2009
Robinson v. Robinson
Citations
- 675 S.E.2d 873
- 54 Va. App. 87
- 2009 Va. App. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where it awarded wife spousal support pursuant to Code § 20-107.1(E) that exceeded what she needed to maintain the standard of living to which she had grown accustomed -7- during the marriage
- recognizing that the 13 economic and noneconomic factors include factor “number thirteen . . . an open-ended directive that ‘the court shall consider . . . [s]uch other factors . . . as are necessary to consider the equities between the parties’” (emphasis added)
- rejecting a spousal -5- support cap, and upholding an award that created a monthly surplus to wife of over $1,110
- “In making that determination [of spousal support], the trial court ‘must consider all the factors enumerated in Code § 20-107.1(E)’” (quoting Fadness v. Fadness, 52 Va. App. 833, 846, 667 S.E.2d 857, 863 (2008))
- “It is well established that “‘trial courts speak only through their orders and . . . such orders are presumed to reflect accurately what transpired.”’” (quoting Rose v. Commonwealth, 265 Va. 430, 435 n.2, 578 S.E.2d 758, 761 n.2 (2003))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frank, McCLANAHAN, Petty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- O'Loughlin v. O'LoughlinCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-12-31· cited 592×
- Congdon v. CongdonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-04-08· cited 519×
- Wactor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-05-28· cited 291×
- Fadness v. FadnessCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-11-04· cited 286×
- Woolley v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-10-21· cited 198×
- Moreno v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-02-11· cited 175×
- Theismann v. TheismannCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1996-07-31· cited 130×
- Gottlieb v. GottliebCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-09-27· cited 125×
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-08-07· cited 117×
- Northcutt v. NorthcuttCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-11-19· cited 116×
- Mary Anne Rowe v. Charles S. RoweCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-02-04· cited 112×
- Dodge v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-05-06· cited 101×
- Miller v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-01-11· cited 93×
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 84×
- McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2001-09-14· cited 60×
- Brooks v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-05-05· cited 60×
- Ray v. RayCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-08-04· cited 32×
- Rose v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2003-04-17· cited 24×
- Bruemmer v. BruemmerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-08-02· cited 24×
- In re the Marriage of GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-04-18· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.