Mary Anne Rowe v. Charles S. Rowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that brother’s efforts and growth in surrounding areas undermined the significance of husband’s contributions to the stock’s increase in value
• holding that husband’s evidence that he had invested $82,000 into a new home was sufficient to retrace the property claimed as separate by husband
• holding that Code § 20-107.1 requires consideration of the “income generating potential” of assets received in equitable distribution
• holding that evidence was sufficient to retrace property claimed by husband as separate
• holding that the husband’s statement to the wife that the home conveyed into joint title was hers was evidence that husband intended to make a gift for equitable distribution purposes
• holding that evidence which proved the husband invested $82,000 of his separate funds was \sufficient for purposes of Code § 20-107.3(A)(3)(d) to retrace the property claimed as separate by the husband\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).