Pilati v. Pilati

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the circuit court’s two findings of fact did not adequately explain its spousal support award
• reversing after the circuit court made only two factual findings and failed to resolve the cause of the dissolution of the marriage
• “With few exceptions, when no specific explanation is given by a trial court, we presume the court followed the governing legal principles . . . .”
• “What weight, if any, to assign to this [or that] factor in the overall decision lies within the trial court’s sound discretion.” (alteration in original) (quoting Robbins v. Robbins, 48 Va. App. 466, 481 (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).