Gina Shaw v. James K. Hahn John Emerson James Pearson Thomas Hokinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding privity when the interests of the party in the subsequent action were shared with and adequately represented by the party in the former action
• taking judicial notice of records to determine preclusive effect of earlier case
• taking judicial notice of records to determine preclusive effect of earlier case
• juror was collaterally estopped from litigating issue of discriminatory use of peremptory challenges; juror's interests were virtually represented by plaintiff in prior proceeding who objected to the discriminatory use of such challenges
• “In deciding whether to dismiss a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), a court may look beyond the plaintiff’s complaint to matters of public record.”
• a court may take judicial notice of exhibits that are referenced in the complaint or matters in the public record without converting the motions 28 into summary judgment motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).