Hydranautics v. Filmtec Corporation, Opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting collateral estoppel claim because while previous lawsuit’s antitrust element — objectively baseless— and the current lawsuit’s malicious prosecution element — without probable cause— were “essentially the same,” they were not “identical”
• listing requirements for issue preclusion under federal law
• listing requirements for issue preclusion under federal law
• stating elements needed to apply collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).