Skip to main content

Roberts v. State

Citations

  • 419 N.E.2d 803
  • 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the failure of counsel to object to improper remarks by the prosecutor is not proof of incompetence.”
  • noting counsel “well may have desired to avoid drawing additional attention” to a particular bit of evidence by making objections and requesting instructions which is a trial tactic the reviewing court will not second guess

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Garrard, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.