Skip to main content

Murray v. State

Citations

  • 479 N.E.2d 1283
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is neither allegation nor showing that the State’s actions here represented a blatant and deliberate refusal to comply with our discovery rules and it therefore was discretionary with the trial court to permit the testimony of witness Essex.”
  • evidence of a large quantity of drugs, scales, and a substantial amount of cash seized from an apartment where the defendant had previously sold drugs, was relevant and material to show that the defendant was involved in possessing and dealing in illegal drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Prentice, Debruler, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.