Roberts v. Smith
Citations
- 72 Fla. 537
- 74 So. 299
Syllabus
<p>Where the appellate court is impressed from the whole record in a cause that there is a strong probability that said cause has resulted in the court below in an injustice to the plaintiff in error, chiefly due to the probable loss or destruction of an original order of the County Judge authorizing a sale of the land in dispute on the application of the guardian for the defendant in error, then a minor, as well as an original order of such County Judge confirming such sale, it may, in order that complete justice may be done in the premises, reverse such cause and award a new trial thereof, with leave to the plaintiff in error to establish, if he can, under the statute in such cases such lost orders for use as evidence at the new trial of the cause.</p>
Judges: Shackleford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Deans v. WilcoxonSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 22×
- Petty v. MaysSupreme Court of Florida· 1883-01-15· cited 17×
- Mansfield v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 16×
- Groover v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-06-15· cited 11×
- Rhodus v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 8×
- Webb v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-01-15· cited 5×
- Williams v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-11-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.