Rhodus v. Heffernan

Citations

• 47 Fla. 206

Syllabus

<p>1. Where the plaintiffs .and defendants in ejectment claim land through a common source of title, errors committed in allowing improper evidence of the title under which all the parties claim, are harmless. ,</p> <p>2. Where the defendants claim title to land under a sale made by order of a county judge on the application of an administrator to pay debts due from the intestate’s estate, parol testimony tending to show that the schedule of debts required by law was presented to the county judge when the application was made, and that it had been lost or mislaid and its contents, where the order of sale recites that all the requirements of the law had been complied with, is competent evidence, tending to show a compliance with the requirements of the law, authorizing a sale of realty in such a case.</p>