Deans v. Wilcoxon
Citations
- 25 Fla. 980
Syllabus
<p>1. The jurisdiction of the Coui.ty Court, under the Constitution of 1868, as amended in ISIS, in the matter of the estates of deceased persons was not exclusive of or a limitation upon the original equity jurisdiction of the Circuit Court in such matters In the absence of special equities whi h the County Court could not administer the jurisdiction of the two courts was concurrent, but where such equities exist the jurisdiction of ihe Circuit Court was exclusive of that of the County Court. The same is true of these courts under the present Constitution.</p> <p>’3. Where a bill filed by the heirs of an intestate ass filing an order of sale of real estate made by the Probate Judge as void for want of jurisdiction, alleges that one of Ihe lots conveyed by an administrator as having been sold pursuant to such order, was in fact not sold or offered for sale, and this allegation is admitted by demurrer, it is improper to consider the validity of the order of sale in connection with such lot.</p> <p>;3. Where a lot, formerly held through mesne conveyances under a title from an administrator, has been surrendered to an administrator de bonis non who holds it as a-sets of the intestate, the effect of possession under claim of title by the party who surrendered it, cannot be considered upon pleadings showing merely these facts.</p> <p>4. Theact of March 11th. 1879, “to quiet titles to real estate, ” Sections 31 and 33, p. 319 of McClellan’s Digest, does not apply to land or which there was in fact no sale made under an order of the Probate Court.</p> <p>'5. An allegation of the solvency of an estate is not essential to the jurisdiction of the County Court to make an order for the sale of real estate of an entestate under the act of February 16th, 1870, McClellan’s Digest, p. 86, Section 40.</p> <p>6. Where the petition for a sale of real estate un-ler the act of February 16th, 1870, McClellan’s Digest, p. 86, Section 40, states that there is “no per-onal property of the i
Judges: Raney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-07-29· cited 38×
- Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 33×
- McClinton v. ChapinSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 21×
- McIntyre v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-05-19· cited 20×
- Mountein v. KingSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-01-10· cited 14×
- Brockson v. Richardson Bros.Superior Court of Delaware· 1942-02-10· cited 6×
- Jones v. LummusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-30· cited 5×
- Roberts v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-12-20· cited 3×
- In re RehearingSupreme Court of Florida· 1929-10-17· cited 1×
- Jacobs v. FarringtonS.D. Florida· 1941-07-28· cited 1×
- Keathley v. SewellSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-06-15
- In re Estate of McVayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-09-24
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Comstock v. CrawfordSupreme Court· 1866-01-18· cited 63×
- Doyle v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida· 1887-01-15· cited 45×
- Worthy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1850-02-15· cited 39×
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1843-01-15· cited 38×
- Sanderson's Administrators v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-06-15· cited 37×
- Rhodes v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1852-06-15· cited 27×
- Deans v. WilcoxonSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-01-15· cited 26×
- Bush v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-01-15· cited 26×
- Whitlock v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida· 1881-01-15· cited 21×
- Swink's Adm'r v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama· 1850-01-15· cited 18×
- Tate v. ClementsSupreme Court of Florida· 1878-01-15· cited 17×
- Hays' Administratrix v. McNealySupreme Court of Florida· 1878-01-15· cited 17×
- Barnett's v. TarrenceSupreme Court of Alabama· 1853-06-15· cited 17×
- Emerson v. Ross'Supreme Court of Florida· 1879-01-15· cited 16×
- Ragland v. Calhoun's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama· 1860-06-15· cited 14×
- Betton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida· 1851-01-15· cited 11×
- Sanchez's Administrator v. HartSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 11×
- Hayden v. DenslowSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1858-09-15· cited 11×
- Hobson v. EwanIllinois Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 11×
- Byrd v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court· 1866-10-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.